Ashok Khemka is in the news again. This time for
submitting his report to the enquiry commission set up by the Haryana
government to investigate his charges against Robert Vadra and DLF. The media
loves Khemka. It has portrayed him as “the most honest officer”, someone who
has the “courage to take on the political establishment”, etc etc. Media loves
people who go against politicians. It helps create good news content, especially
on TV. Media also doesn’t bother much about truth, forget the real truth. But
this blog does!
I have personally been involved in
recruitments for jobs in my company for more than a decade now. And the one
thing I have learnt is not to hire someone who changes jobs in an almost “predictable”
pattern – typically every 1.5 to 2 years. When I meet them, I get immediately
impressed by their confidence, their academic record, their “achievements”.
Every single time, I have been convinced that the person has a “genuine” reason
to look for a change, even though its so soon. These guys are smart. They have
high IQ. They are good looking, well dressed…..basically they come to impress.
I have been conned many times by such people. In the end, I have realized that
we simply cannot hold on to such people beyond the usual 1.5 to 2 years. They
move on. It’s not a reflection on my company; it’s just that there are such
loonies out there. I have now issued a standing instruction to my HR team now:
Do not meet such people.
Ashok Khemka fits this description to the T.
He is brilliant – a Computer engineer from IIT, a PhD, an MBA, and god knows
what else. He is impressive in his conduct – just observe him on TV shows and
he comes out as confident, honest, sincere – not a typical rabble rouser but as
someone deeply concerned about the country. Khemka is also very very smart. He
has made himself look like the victim of politics – repeatedly brandishing his
“41 transfers in 21 years” as evidence of victimization. An audience of TV news
watchers – seeking juicy, gossipy, political entertainment every evening –
latches onto his every word. Khemka goes from one channel to another, spreading
his victimization word. And they all lap it up. I wouldn’t be surprised if Khemka
is recommended by media for one of the Padma awards…..just for his help in
building up their TRPs. In the recent past, another such person has come
centerstage – Arvind Kejriwal. Another smart, well educated bureaucrat, who
turned hostile against his own employers. Where he is headed will be known
soon. Where Khemka is headed though is already known – to the next TV studio.
Khemka would have been sacked a long while
ago in the private sector. He would be called a “trouble maker”. But the
government is a benevolent employer. Sacking is not something that it does. It
transfers when it cannot handle someone any more. Yes, Khemka has been
transferred innumerable times, but for a change, let’s turn the wheel on him
and see just how responsible he himself is for this.
Khemka has worked in many many departments of
the Haryana government: Land Revenue – management and district administration,
Agriculture and co-operations co-operative (don’t ask me what it means!), HRD,
Social Jusice & Empowerment, Law & Justice, Personnel & General
Administration, Labor and Employment, Communications & IT, Urban Development,
Commerce, Finance, Rural Development, Industries, Consumer Affairs, Food and
Public Distribution…..and god knows how many more. So he’s been given a fair
chance by his employer. How is it that he couldn’t succeed anywhere? Is it
anyone’s point that all departments
are corrupt? And that he never felt empowered enough or responsible enough to
clean up the mess?
Khemka has worked under several political
parties and CMs. In his last 21 years, he has worked under the Haryana Vikas
Party of Bansi Lal (later merged into the Congress), the INLD (Chautala) –
which was in alliance with the BJP, and of course the INC (Bhajan Lal,
Bhoopinder Singh Hooda). How is it that he could not work under any boss? Is it
his point that every political party is corrupt and pathetic? That there is no
one that he can work with? Then why did he join the IAS at all? In the private
sector, the needle of suspicion would have shifted onto Khemka long back –
after he failed with 2-3 bosses. Here he survives, and in fact, is being hailed
as a hero.
Khemka has had tenures as small as 1 month
(in fact, a few of just a few days). What do you “unearth” in 1 month that is
so sensational and incriminating of politicians that you become an immediate
nuicance and have to be shunted out? When in the urban development ministry, he
was there for just 19 days. And he was shunted out. What did he do or find in
19 days? Just as another statistic, he was shunted out within 6 months in 20 of
his 41 postings. What kind of an officer has a record like that? Here’s one
more: his longest stint has been for 1 year and 9 months when he was with the
Industries ministry between 2008 and 2010 – with the same CM in charge. How
come he is unable to survive when so many of his other IAS brethren survive and
thrive? Are they all corrupt because they don’t get transferred like he does?
Khemka has held positions of power and
authority, where he could have effected changes if he wanted to. He’s held
secretary level postings, been Managing Director of government undertakings –
he’s had his fair chance at making changes, but has he? No. Not once.
In reality, Khemka is an abject failure. The
kind of person who cannot claim to have achieved anything in his professional
life. I think he is like the “runaway bride” – running away from
responsibilities, worried that if he stays too long in a job, he will be held
responsible for his deeds, or misdeeds. So he finds excuses to go, becoming
inconvenient, preferring to be “thrown out” than be exposed as a professional
failure.
The real truth is that my sympathies would have been with
Khemka if his record was not so pathetic.
I would have understood if he had been shunted out a few times, and by one
particular party or boss. But 41 times, and sometimes within 19 days? And by
all political parties? Sorry, I think he is not a hero, but just an abject
failure….
No comments:
Post a Comment