When the NSS (National Sample Survey) report
indicated that poverty had reduced sharply during the UPA rule since 2004-5
(@2.18 % per annum), the usual happened. The opposition scorned the Congress
for putting out such lies just before the elections. The activists cried that the
data was all wrong and poverty was actually worse now. Even the intellectuals
(the economists) tore apart (once again) the Tendulkar poverty line of Rs 32 (or
is it 33?) per capita per day. All of this took the shine off the Congress’s claims.
And even made it doubt its own achievements. So much so that even the well-regarded
Montek Singh Ahluwalia agreed that Rs 32 was too low.
But now, as the froth settles, the truth is
starting to emerge (why don’t we have a law in this country that we will not express
any opinions for at least one month after something happens!). And the truth is
that a) the poverty cut-off of Rs 32 is indeed correct, and in line with a
global reference point articulated by the World Bank, which is $1.25 per capita
per day on PPP (purchasing power parity) basis. Why is Rs 32 the same as $1.25?
Because of a much lower cost of living in India. And why is that so? Because of
the massive subsidies that the GoI gives to its poor. But for sensation-seeking
media anchors, PPP is too fine a point to appreciate b) poverty has dramatically
reduced because of rapid growth. The estimate of poverty is accurate since it
is based on the respondent’s own “recall” of weekly, monthly and annual
expenditures. Surjit Bhalla explains this beautifully in his 20th July
piece in the Indian Express. He also explains why the “sudden and dramatic”
fall of 9.4% in just the last two years – between 2009-10 and 2011-12 – is so
credible.
Even noted columnist Swaminathan S Anklesaria
Aiyar said the same thin in the TOI on 28th July (“Why no applause for 138
million exiting poverty?”): When China
reduced people in poverty by 220 million between 1978 and 2004, the world
applauded this as the greatest poverty reduction in history.India has just
reduced its number of poor from 407 million to 269 million, a fall of 138
million in seven years between 2004-05 and 2011-12. This is faster than China’s
poverty reduction rate at a comparable stage of development, though for a much
shorter period. Are the China-cheerers hailing India for doing even better?
What economists – or at least those belonging
to one particular ideology – still don’t like to give credit to the Congress for
is for the party’s “direct” poverty alleviation programs – such as the NREGA
and the Food Security Ordinance . They believe that the poverty reduction is
entirely because of growth. They believe in the “trickle down” impact of
growth. But there are others – like the much attacked Amartya Sen – who believe
that while a capitalistic model can deliver growth, it also simultaneously
delivers inequality. It’s obvious. A Mukesh Ambani can help hasten industrial
growth, but at the same time, he helps himself to a much bigger reward as well.
It is because Ambani can profit so much, grow his wealth so fast, that acts as
his incentive. Something the communist, state driven model of governance can
never deliver. Somehow, none of us likes to admit to this obvious truth. If
this is true – that capitalism creates inequality – then there has to be an
automatic justification for “redistribution” of wealth.
No one can deny that poverty has come down.
And the Congress must rightfully claim full credit for it. No only can also
deny that growth is one of the major factors for this reduction. We today
forget this fact, but as recently as in 2010-11, India grew at 10.2% per annum.
It’s only in the last two years that we have floundered. But even now, we are
the 2nd fastest growing major economy in the world. The fall in
growth in unfortunate, but is hardly an Indian problem alone.
The primary architect of the economic
progress is no doubt the PM. His actions in 1991 opened up the economy. That is
when India’s growth started to skyrocket. The only time when the growth rate
slowed down was during the BJP’s six years of rule. Growth was faster before, and after, the BJP rule. Surely,
there were some local factors that led to this, but the real reason for this was
that the BJP was more focused on its identity priorities (defending Narendra
Modi on Godhra, promoting Hindu mumbo-jumbo in schools) than on anything
remotely economic (save and except for starting the Highways program, bulk of
which the UPA finished). Aakar Patel has argued convincingly that for a Brahmin
(the core of the BJP/RSS), protecting his identity (religion) is most
important, while for a baniya party (not a party for baniyas!) like Congress, “doing business” was most important. Since
2004, Manmohan Singh’s government was doing the right thing when it continued
with 2G “subsidized” license fees, but the lunatic CAG made a big fuss out of it. It did the
right thing in bringing in coal auctions, but the same lunatic CAG again put
the blame for the previous policy (pursued since 1993) on the same PM’s neck. How
ironic. The man who changed a corrupt system stood accused of allowing
corruption. It is such politically motivated, completely destructive
pronouncements of the CAG that have hurt India in the last two years. Any
government would go into paralysis. Fortunately, it has now regained its wits.
And policy paralysis is quickly morphing into policy activism. Hopefully,
growth will resume. And poverty reduction will start again in right earnest. In
the meantime it would help if our pseudo intellectuals, and unintelligent media
anchors refrained from commenting on things they don’t understand.
The real truth is that no matter what BJP supporters think,
the fact is that growth has been highest during UPA rule, and poverty reduction
as well. The experts are saying so, and forcefully. This is a moment for us to
feel proud, not play politics….
No comments:
Post a Comment