What’s the point of debating such
issues in Parliament? When the entire issue has already been discussed
threadbare by these very same politicians on TV and in print. Every single
point and counterpoint has already been made. There was nothing new that came
out in the debate at all. Even the voting went on predictable lines. Why then
the insistence on the debate; especially since it was clearly in the domain of
the Executive. It was after all nothing but a colossal waste of Parliamentary
time; time that could have been utilized to discuss other bills.
The same debates will now happen
and time will be wasted again in the Rajya Sabha. The same accusations will be
levied by the opposition all over again; the ridiculous concept of FDI v/s CBI
will be deployed to justify another defeat. This CBI thingy must be put to rest
once and for all. The outgoing CBI Director, AP Singh said before departing
that the CBI was not investigating
any cases against M&M. All those cases were already with the courts and the
CBI’s role was already over. This is a matter of fact. There cannot be any
denial of a factual position. But the BJP still believes that this is not true.
Then why doesn’t it put out some specifics in the public domain? Which cases –
or alleged cases – are they referring to? Even Kejriwal, the Joker in the political
pack, gives specifics, no matter how overchewed or silly they are. Then why not
the BJP? Not giving specifics makes me believe this CBI thingy is nothing but a
bogey; a kind of a face saver for the BJP every time it loses the vote.
If the BJP already knew that was
going to be FDI v/s CBI, why did it insist on a debate at all? Even more so,
why a debate with voting? If they think they will be able to go to UP and tell
the people “see how your parties are
behaving in Parliament”, they are being naïve. UP doesn’t care for the BJP
any longer. The people of UP look at the BJP as a party of opportunistic Hindus
who exploited Ayodhya to suit their political needs; then turned their backs on
them. A recent Mint issue on Ayodhya brings all this out clearly.
And how come the CBI logic works
only with the two UP parties? Why does it not work with the BJD or the SAD or
the AIADMK or the JD(U)? Are the leaders of all these parties squeaky clean, so
the CBI has no dirt against them? Or is the Congress just benevolent towards
them? For if the Congress was this monster that the BJP claims it is, it would
have been liberally harassing everyone to secure their votes in Parliament. But
these parties continue to defy the Congress, sometimes completely irrationally.
Taking this logic further, why does the CBI not control the BJP itself on
behalf of the Congress? Surely the BJP has no dearth of leaders against whom
fingers can be pointed and cases mounted? I do agree that the CBI is abused.
Partly by the ruling party. But much more by the opposition.
But coming back to the main
point, why was there the need for the debate at all when the arguments were all
the same, the performers as well and the outcome was exactly as expected? What
does the debate show that we didn’t already know? That a bulk of the parties
don’t support FDI in retail? That these parties will speak one way and vote
another? If all was already known, then why waste two full days in the LS and now,
two more in the RS? In fact, the number of days wasted is much more; Parliament
was first disrupted for four days, and then even when the agreement to vote was
reached, the Government was completely seized by the tension around the issue. Had
it not been put to this unnecessary test, it could have done something
meaningful instead.
The BJP clearly miscalculated its
chances with the vote in the LS. It lost face yet again. If it just wanted to
embarrass the Government, it should have insisted on voting in the RS alone.
The Government is going to face a tough challenge there; in fact, it might even
lose the vote there. The BJP could have taken the moral high ground by
conceding the voting in the LS; using that concession to show that it was
willing to walk half the distance. The BJP could have scored some brownie
points in the RS. Its highly unlikely that the loss will compel the Congress to
abandon the FDI policy. What will happen is that there will be a huge
controversy. The BJP will say that the Congress should withdraw the policy; the
Congress will say it has no compulsion to do so since it was always only an
Executive decision. And everyone will get political fodder to use over the next
few months. Why, I wouldn’t be surprised if this very issue is used to stop
Parliament for the remaining days of the session.
I was always against testing an
Executive decision in Parliament. I wrote on this on Nov 20th “Why a vote on FDI in multi-brand retail is a
wrong idea….”. Now wait and see what happens. The next Executive decision –
say another Rs 3-5 increase in diesel prices; or a disinvestment decision; or
something else will also be forced into a discussion in Parliament. The whole
rigmarole will be repeated. Time will be wasted. For the opposition, all this
is just a way to ensure no business gets done. Then they can go to the people
in 2014 and say that the Government did nothing in its last five years.
Shamefull really. And with complete disregard for the national interest.
The real truth is that
Parliament has become everyone’s *#$%&. Everyone exploits it. Anyone can
stop its functioning. And even when it does function, it debates issues which
have been done to death already. All proceedings in Parliament are intended purely
for political reasons, not to make policies better. Politicians know their
performance is watched by millions over TV. If they just stopped allowing cameras
inside Parliament, all this charade would stop. It’s a good idea. Definitely
worth considering.
No comments:
Post a Comment