Exactly what should not have happened has happened. Even worse than jingoism is
stooping to the level of a pesky criminal and emulating his actions. That’s
exactly what seems to have happened when a Pakistani prisoner was attacked in a
Jammu jail yesterday – clearly in retaliation against the fate meted out by
Pakistani prisoners to Sarabjit recently. This kind of barbaric retaliation
doesn’t do any good for India’s image; besides, it goes against the very
definition of Gandhi’s India – one of forbearance against retaliation.
Suddenly the shoe is on the other foot. Suddenly all the
shrill questions we were asking the Pakistanis will now be asked of us.
Suddenly the word “lawless” will apply to India as much as it does to Pakistan.
Unfortunately, we have gone down to the level of our wayward neighbor;
surrendered our moral high-ground. This post is not written to schmooze or
defend Pakistan. That country remains our perennial enemy and must be dealt
with in a variety of ways to contain it. This post is written from an Indian
point of view – from a sense of anguish that India will again be bracketed with
the likes of its neighbors.
So lets see what questions we asked Pakistan over the last
few days. These same questions the Pakistanis will now pose to us: How did
Sanaullah’s fellow prisoner have weapons on him? Surely that indicates a Indian
conspiracy of retaliation? What were the jail authorities doing when all this
happened? Why did they not heed the advice given by the Indian government that
such an attack could take place against Pakistani prisoners? The Pakistani
government will demand that India return the prisoner to it. Or takes him to a
third country for treatment, hinting that our medical facilities are sub-Saharan
(and hurting our pride of being a preferred destination for medical tourism).
They will demand that we first suspend and then punish prison authorities who
allowed all this to happen “right under their noses”.
We deserve none of this. In global politics, India stands
out as being an island of justice and fair play, surrounded by belligerent, don’t-care-for-human-rights
regimes whether it is Sri Lanka or Pakistan or China. Even in American TV
shows, India is shown as a fast growing economic miracle while Pakistan is
shown as a terrorist hub. Watch Homeland
and you will realize how a CIA boss is shown married to an Indian woman (a
driven professional, one who sacrifices her personal life to chase her goals) and
a Mumbai based call center is featured. In contrast, an Arab is put under
suspicion merely because of his frequent travels to Karachi. This kind of
portrayal is not limited to this one show. It’s a stereotype that has developed
since 9/11. India’s own foreign policy (which right wingers – most notably the
BJP – will never understand) of “de-hyphenating” itself from Pakistan was
implemented flawlessly in the last decade. The US embraced India, welcoming it
to the nuclear club; in fact, pushing its candidacy through very difficult and
obdurate Europeans. When Pakistan demanded the same status, it was show the
middle finger.
India forced the US leaders not to mix their India trips
with hop overs in Pakistan. The PMs and Presidents of all the 5 nuclear nations – US, UK, France, China and Russia – came
visiting India last year to build their relationships with India. None visited
Pakistan. This attack – this behaving like them – has made India look like we
are no different from them. The only difference is that we have a democracy and
they have a military-backed or military-controlled government (read Dilip
Padgaonkar’s editorial in TOI today – Dealing
with a cussed Pakistan).
So I am not being a Pakistani apologist here. I don’t think
that this Pakistani prisoner deserved any sympathy from us. I don’t think he
was innocent like Sarabjit was. I don’t think the Pakistanis are anything but
cruel and inhuman. But the prisoner deserved safety in our jail. It
unnecessarily forces India to surrender its moral high-ground. It unnecessarily
equates India with Pakistan. And it unnecessarily re-hyphenates India with
Pakistan.
In any case, media frenzy around events is starting to drive
the Government’s response these days. Salman Khursheed is reportedly canceling
his trip to China, as if that will solve the problem. He is clearly catering to
the BJP’s demand that he do so. Will the Indian government’s response to this
prisoner attack be a weak one or will it be exemplary? In the past, the
Government has been seen as being fair even to the worst criminals – Kasab was
given full legal representation and access to the Indian justice system, and
not rushed into execution. In the developed world, that earned us accolades,
even though many right-wingers in India saw it as a sign of the Congress’s
“softness”. I am worried that a harried Indian government, in an election year,
will be forced to take a hardline stance that lowers our standing, when it
should be doing the exact opposite.
I can also imagine a hardline BJP giving a silly “This is bound to happen” kind of statement, like it gave after pulling down the Babri Masjid (remember the “it was a popular movement” line?). I can also imagine hardliners like Modi making it a campaign point. An eye for an eye should be India’s approach, Gandhi be damned, is what he will say. I can imagine a lot of people – with right-wing leanings no doubt – speaking in defence of what an ex-Army man did to the Pakistani prisoner, even calling him a hero. Pathetic.
The real truth is that we have been shamed by this
murder inside our jail. We are now just as guilty of cruelty as we accuse
Pakistan to be. That self-destructive, wretched nation deserved no space to
play; now we have given them that space. It’s another sad day for the
country…..just as yesterday was when Sarabjit died.
No comments:
Post a Comment