This is what I was really
worried about. Apparently, the snooping on the girl in Gujarat was not a lone
case. Firstpost.in reports (http://tinyurl.com/pwgoscr) that as many as 93000 illegal mobile phone
tappings took place in just six months in Gujarat between Dec 2012 and May
2013. Phone tappings may be a less severe form of surveillance than physical snooping
itself, but surely there is a worrisome story here.
Firstpost.in adds “reports
now say phone tapping has been rampant in Gujarat, with a DGP discovering this
year that as many as 93,000 mobile phones’ call data records had been obtained
without his knowledge since December 2012”. The web publisher further
reports “A report in The Hindustan Times
says agencies such as the Gujarat Police, the IB, the Anti-Terror Squad and the
Crime Branch are all routinely conduct illegal surveillance, either for
investigations or at the instance of their political bosses. The extent of
snooping is so pervasive that Gujarat’s director general of police Amitabh
Pathak (now deceased) was shocked to learn in May that his own police officials
had obtained call detail records of as many as 93,000 mobile phone numbers
without his knowledge since December 2012”.
Referring to the same report, Firstpost.in writes further “The report also quotes from an affidavit
filed by former IPS officer RB Sreekumar before the Justice Nanavati Commission
probing the 2002 riots case in which he states that he was asked to rap the
phones of BJP leader Haren Pandya and Congress leader Shankersingh Vaghela”.
Firstpost.in then refers to a report in the TOI (http://tinyurl.com/pyng6hc) “This
report in the Times of India published in 2005 quotes BJP MLA Gordhan Zadaphia
complaining about the Modi government engaging in illegal tapping of phones of
MLAs and MPs. The report also said intelligence officers believed that official
taps on phones was time-consuming and required several levels of permissions.
It becomes more fruitful in this scenario to take the service provider into
confidence and come to an “unofficial arrangement, the report said”.
What is clear from all this is that the stalking case was
not an isolated one. Abuse of the power to tap is rampant. Abuse of the state
police machinery is rampant. What is the power used for? In part, to get
political leverage. Apart from Haren Pandya and Shankersingh Vaghela, Keshubhai
Patel was also reportedly as complaining about being snooped upon. Any
surprises that Modi has been besting his political rivals one after another
over the years? We now know why. He had access to confidential information about
his rivals. "Ipsa scientia potestas est" ('knowledge itself is
power') is one of the most powerful weapons in politics.
What is perhaps even more stinking than the stalking,
snooping and phone tapping scam itself is the way the BJP has been mounting its
defence of Modi and Shah. The defence speaks more about the mindset of the BJP
supporters. Madhu Kishwar (who supports Modi almost 100% of the times, even
though she is a journalist and expected to be unbiased) tweeted ““56 yr old officer under watch of government
4 criminal misdeeds misuses posn to sexually exploit woman yng enf to be grd
dtr, parents shd say fine?”. What is she saying? That the girl has no
rights of her own? They can be usurped by her father, as if he “possesses” her?
Meenakshi Lekhi, spokesperson of the BJP, has made inane accusations about the
Congress asking how the tapes got out. Arre, forget how the tapes got out. The
point is why what happened, happened.
And where is the “protected” girl (the victim really) in all
this? Why is she not coming out and saying what she has to say? Why is her
father fronting for her all this time? What is she afraid of? Did the girl
really know what was going on? Did she know that even the phones of her family
members were being tapped? Did she know that there were cops put on the flight
that she took when she traveled out of Ahmedabad? Did she know that cops were
monitoring her interactions with friends, including men? All of this looks
extremely unlikely.
The real truth is that this snooping episode, along
with many others – the 2002 riots, the numerous illegal fake encounters, the
murder of Haren Pandya after he turned a government baiter, the tampering with
the judicial process forcing the SC to move cases out of the state, the
harassment of bureaucrats who don’t toe the line, the failure to appoint (or
strategy not to appoint) a Lok Ayukta for more than a decade and later amend
the law itself using brute legislative majority to wrest power of the
appointment process, the absence of an adequate number of RTI commissioners –
all points to Gujarat having become a classic police state over Modi’s tenure. If
this is part of Modi’s “Gujarat model”, I don’t want any part of it….
No comments:
Post a Comment