When he said yesterday that Rs 71
lacs was a pittance for a central minister to embezzle, the media immediately
came out with knives drawn. They forgot that they had themselves accused many
in the Government of “shooting the messenger” when an activist brought out uncomfortable
facts about our politicians. They were quick to shame Verma. Verma became the
laughing stock online in no time. But just pause for a minute and think of what
he said. Stop heckling him. Think also of the “advice” he gave Kejriwal. His
two statements are profound realities. If we understand them, we will benefit
from them.
When the Rs 71 lac story around
Salman Khurshid’s NGO first broke, that was my exact same reaction. Rs 71 lacs
is a pittance in Indian politics. In fact, when the “VBS” story broke a few
days earlier, in which many diary entries were shown containing figures of Rs 5
and 10 lacs allegedly paid to ministers and CMs, my reaction was the same then
too. Civil society activists and media get excited by every small thing, but
the reality is that these are indeed very small sums. If illegal funding of our
elections (and I propose that this be removed from the definition of corruption
– but more on this later) was of this small order, we would all be a happy lot!
On the contrary, the truth is that more than Rs 5 crores is required on average per Lok Sabha seat. In the
more affluent areas (where the “payback period” is shorter!), the spends could
go up to Rs 25 crores and some would say even Rs 50 crores per seat. And like
the PM said earlier in a different context “Money doesn’t grow on trees”.
Election funding money certainly doesn’t. In fact, “donors” to election funds
are amongst the savviest of financial investors – demanding much higher returns
than the usual financial markets could offer.
Of course, every penny of
corruption is unacceptable and Rs 71 lacs is certainly more than a few pennies (though
I must point out that Salman doesn't appear to have pocketed any of it). But
there was nothing abominable in what Verma said. The problem with our media is
that it is way out of line with the market realities. It fails to understand
the truth about election funding and finds every small bit of information
titillating. What was media’s reaction to Verma’s statement? It derided him;
called him a fool; and eventually forced him to withdraw his statement. Fine.
He withdrew it. But does that change the reality on the ground? Instead of
drawing attention to how much we have started spending on elections, it quickly
put a lid on the subject. An opportunity to discuss something so important was
squandered away.
Then Verma – who appeared to be in
turbo-charged form yesterday – made another profound statement. He advised the
Joker (in the political pack – henceforth abbreviated to just Joker) Kejriwal
that if he barked everyday (ranted on some or the other politician) then he would
merely be a dog. But if he did it only once in a while, he would be a tiger! Rustic
and vengeful as this advice may appear to be, it is true. I don’t know what
happened to Vadra. Has anyone anywhere filed any case against him at all? Or
has it all been left to the Directors of DLF to ask questions of the management
and promoters – which should have been the case in the first place? And what
happened to VBS? Again, did any FIR get registered? Not sure. Such is the pace
at which the Joker wants to reveal the real truth that he cannot wait to catch
his breath!
Since we are talking of dogs
here, it is worth pointing out that there is another Hindi saying which no one
mentioned yesterday and which also has an English equivalent which is relevant
here: “to run with your tail between your legs”. That expression is apt to
describe the Joker’s “tactical” decision to stop the stir against Salman. What
happened suddenly? Did Joker realize he was on thin ice here? Did the
defamation suit of Rs 240 crores scare the wits out of him? As a fig leaf,
Joker’s team is saying that they haven’t “let him off the hook” and have
already “pronounced him guilty” (behaving like Judges that they are!). They
have taken the fight to his constituency, Farrukhabad. I feel like laughing at
such imbecility. The Joker must realize that the only fuel his party (can be
called Joker party???) works on is the fuel of TV cameras. Who’s going to give
him that fuel in Farrukhabad for god’s sake. Does anyone even know where Farrukhabad
is????
Verma is right. Joker barks too
often to be taken seriously. The people are now expected to await the attack on
Gadkari. That episode airs tomorrow (Wednesday). Sounds like a TV soap? It is.
It is almost fiction. Or a reality show filled with typical over-acting. Either
way, its drama galore.
Now the last word on election
funding. If politicians require as much funding as mentioned earlier, it is but
natural that they are going to get the money from somewhere. The Election
Commission’s response to this has been puerile. It has put a lid on official
expenses, limiting them to ridiculous levels, thinking such a rule would reduce
election funding. This is naivete at its best. One of the reasons why so much
black money exists in elections is because of this arbitrary and completely
infeasible cap. So politicians have no option but to fund their campaigns
through illegal means. If this is going to be called corruption, then everyone is corrupt. If Joker is going
to find “evidence” of such corruption, its hardly a story worth putting on
prime time. Senior politicians also have to raise funds for their party’s activities.
Some of this also goes towards funding the younger politicians. In my humble
opinion, corruption to this extent should be taken as an unfortunate reality. People
who indulge to this extent should not be bandied around as thugs and dacoits.
There are the really corrupt ones of course – for whom entering politics and making
money has become a business. Those are the really corrupt ones on whom our
focus should be. But all that gets lost in the Joker’s penchant for speaking nineteen
to the dozen.
The real truth is that
election funding needs to be acknowledged, legitimized and made transparent. Rs
71 lacs is indeed a pittance. The real spends are much much more. We can joke
about Verma and his rustic antics….but what he spoke was the truth!
No comments:
Post a Comment